Aghazadeh Nessa; Rahnama Nooshin; Nasrollahi Saman Ahmad; Komeili Ali; Firooz Alireza; Dowlati Yahya
Volume 20, Issue 1 , 2017, , Pages 15-20
Abstract
Background: Iran has achieved rapid scientific growth in the past two decades. Considerable growth in scientific publications by Iranian dermatologists matches the pace of Iran’s scientific publications in the previous decade. In this study, we aim to identify the current trends in Iranian dermatology ...
Read More
Background: Iran has achieved rapid scientific growth in the past two decades. Considerable growth in scientific publications by Iranian dermatologists matches the pace of Iran’s scientific publications in the previous decade. In this study, we aim to identify the current trends in Iranian dermatology publications and authorship over the past decade. Methods: We compared papers indexed in the MEDLINE database at two time points, 2004 and 2014, using the PubMed Search engine. Results: We found 145 dermatology papers from Iran in 2014 compared to 31 papers in 2004, with an annual growth rate of 36.8%. There was a highly significant increase in the mean number of authors per article from 3.1 to 5.02 (P<0.001), with a significant decrease in the number of single-author papers. A significant decrease existed in the number of male first authors (83.9% to 63.4%; P=0.03). The number of papers published in specialized dermatology journals significantly decreased in 2014 from 80.6% to 42.1% (P<0.001), with 41.4% of the total papers published in Iranian journals. The mean impact factor (IF) per paper dropped from 2.01 to 1.75. Conclusion: The number of international publications by the Iranian dermatologist has proliferated during the past decade. Encouragement of international collaborations, production of high-quality and novel research, improvements to the standards and visibility of national journals, and higher adherence to authorship and publication ethics are essential perquisites for a more productive future for dermatology research in Iran.
Nasrollahi Saman Ahmad; Hasanzadeh Hournaz; Ajami Marjan; Ameri Setareh; Variji Zeinab; Komeili Ali; Firooz Alireza
Volume 18, Issue 4 , 2015, , Pages 145-150
Abstract
Background: Cellulite is a common disease whose exact mechanism is unknown. This study was aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an anti-cellulite preparation compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind, right-left comparison clinical trial.Methods: Twelve healthy women aged 22 to 58 years ...
Read More
Background: Cellulite is a common disease whose exact mechanism is unknown. This study was aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an anti-cellulite preparation compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind, right-left comparison clinical trial.Methods: Twelve healthy women aged 22 to 58 years with mild to moderate cellulite on their thighs and buttocks participated in this trial. The anti-cellulite preparation (Three O cream, Pouya Varzan Tejarat Sepahan Co., Iran) and an identical placebo were randomly applied on the right or left thigh and buttock twice a day for 2 months. The mentioned areas were photographed and the circumference, subcutaneous fat thickness, and dermis density and thickness were measured before and after treatment. A satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all volunteers to assess their satisfaction with the efficacy of treatment on each side.Results: There was no significant difference between active and placebo treatment sides in any of measurements. About 90% of participants had an overall satisfaction of 5 and more than 5 based on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale on the side of anti-cellulite cream. This score was similar on the sides treated with placebo and the active product.Conclusion: Although Three O cream provided more satisfaction in volunteers than placebo, the objective measurements did not show any difference between them.