Tabari Soudabeh Tirgar; Moghadam Nia Ali Akbar; Hajian Karimollah; Moeinzadeh Amirmajid
Volume 12, Issue 4 , 2009, , Pages 106-110
Abstract
Introduction: Topical antimicrobials, such as clindamycin, are effective in the treatment of acne and azelaic acid, due to the lack of bacterial resistance, could be a useful alternative in topical treatment of acne. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical azelaic acid 20% with clindamycin ...
Read More
Introduction: Topical antimicrobials, such as clindamycin, are effective in the treatment of acne and azelaic acid, due to the lack of bacterial resistance, could be a useful alternative in topical treatment of acne. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical azelaic acid 20% with clindamycin 1% lotion for the treatment of acne. Method: This randomized clinical trial study was performed on 108 patients with mild and moderate acne. Patient were randomly assigned to one of the two groups of treatment with azelaic acid 20% cream (50 patients) or clindamycin 1% lotion (58 patients). The patients were evaluated by grading and lesion counting methods before treatment and one month and two months after the treatment. Results: The mean age of the patients in clindamycin group and azalic acid was 19. 6±3. 9 and 20. 3±4. 5 years, respectively (P=0. 41). The mean score of acne severity decreased after treatment according to grading and lesion counting methods (P0. 05) Conclusion: Result showed that the azelaic acid 20% topical cream was as effective as clindamycin 1% lotion for treating mild to moderate acne.
Shizarpour Mohammad; Firooz Alireza; Pazooki Hamidreza; Khiabanloo Samad Rezai
Volume 11, Issue 2 , 2008, , Pages 67-72
Abstract
Background: Acne vulgaris is the most common cause for dermatology visits and is one of the most common diseases that people experience during their lives. Although this disease is not life-threatening, it may affect the life quality of the patients because of developing irreparable complications on ...
Read More
Background: Acne vulgaris is the most common cause for dermatology visits and is one of the most common diseases that people experience during their lives. Although this disease is not life-threatening, it may affect the life quality of the patients because of developing irreparable complications on the skin. Dermatologists are in agreement about topical treatment in the mild to moderate acne vulgaris, but extensive using of tropical antibiotics and drug resistance have decreased their therapeutic benefits. In this study, we tried to compare the therapeutic effects of tropical azithromycin and clindamycin. Methods: This study was designed and performed as a double blind, randomized clinical trial. Thirty two patients with mild to moderate acne were treated with azithromycin and 30 patients, who were matched with the former group based on age, sex and severity of the disease, were treated with clindamycin for 12 weeks and results of their treatment were compared with each other. Results: results of this study showed that ratio of response to treatment and decreasing the grade of the disease and number of nodules, papules and pustules were not significantly different in the first month of the treatment in both groups while just the number of nodules in the group on azithromycin showed more decrease in the last months of treatment in comparison with clindamycin (0.88±0.75 vs. 0.25±0.75, p=0.015). Also, clindamycin had more side effects, but the rate of satisfaction with both drugs were high and showed no difference. In this study, no significant association was found between sex and response to treatment and evaluation of association between age and response to treatment showed a significant reverse association between age and decreasing the number of pustules (p=0.002 , r= - 0.492). Conclusion: sum of findings in this study show that topical azithromycin is an effective antibiotic with acceptable side effects and high degree of satisfaction in patients and it can be used for the treatment of mild forms of acne.
L Dastgheib; A Alborzi; F Djokar; B Abudi; M Kalani
Volume 6, Issue 1 , 2002, , Pages 5-9
Abstract
Background: Acne vulgaris is a self-limited disease that mainly involves the sebaceous follicles. Systemic antibiotic is a common therapeutic modality, so bacterial resistance can be a problem. Objectives: Assessment of Propionibacterium resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, clindamycin and spiramycin. ...
Read More
Background: Acne vulgaris is a self-limited disease that mainly involves the sebaceous follicles. Systemic antibiotic is a common therapeutic modality, so bacterial resistance can be a problem. Objectives: Assessment of Propionibacterium resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, clindamycin and spiramycin. Patients and Methods: Sampling was done on lesions of 123 patients with acne vulgaris who referred to dermatology clinic of Shahid Dr. Faghihi hospital in Shiraz. After isolation and confirmation of P.acne minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of above-mentioned antibiotics were measured with agar dilution test. Results: From 123 patients, 129 samples were taken. Presence of P.acnes was confirmed in 62 samples. MICs for antibiotics were: Tetracycline 0.03-0.125 µg/ml, erythromycin 0.015-0.06 µg/ml, clindamycin 0.03-0.5 µg/ml and spiramycin 0.015-0.25 µg/ml. Conclusion: The samples of P.acnes isolated from acne vulgaris lesions in this study were sensitive to above mentioned antibiotics.
