Rezvan Amiri; Saman Mohammadi; Saman Azizi; Abbas Pardakhty; Maryam Khalili; Mahin Aflatoonian
Abstract
Background: Conventional topical treatments for male-pattern alopecia (MPA) have limited penetration into hair follicles and unwanted side effects, resulting in low patient compliance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of niosomal kopexil 1% lotion compared with niosomal minoxidil 2% lotion ...
Read More
Background: Conventional topical treatments for male-pattern alopecia (MPA) have limited penetration into hair follicles and unwanted side effects, resulting in low patient compliance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of niosomal kopexil 1% lotion compared with niosomal minoxidil 2% lotion in patients with MPA.Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial at Afzalipour Hospital of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. Thirty participants with MPA were randomized to apply 1 ml of niosomal minoxidil 2% lotion or niosomal kopexil 1% lotion twice a day for 24 weeks. We assessed the efficacy of treatments as the percentage of change in hair density in monthly sessions compared to the baseline using a dermatoscope; we also assessed patient satisfaction and side effects.Results: Thirty participants were enrolled, 29 of whom completed the study. The mean change in hair density was significantly higher with niosomal kopexil compared with niosomal minoxidil (23.2 ± 1.3 and 14.2 ± 0.2, respectively). The hair density increased by 57.6 ± 3.7% and 25.6 ± 4.2% in the kopexil and minoxidil groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients reported significantly greater satisfaction with niosomal kopexil than with niosomal minoxidil (P < 0.001). No side effects were reported in either group.Conclusion: Despite the lower concentration, niosomal kopexil revealed significantly higher efficacy of treatment and satisfaction of patients compared to niosomal minoxidil.